Friday, 22 February 2013

NGOs proud of contribution to mineral sector reform



Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) operating in the West African sub-region say they have made strides at influencing reforms in the mineral sector of many member countries of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).
They have been successful, for instance, at influencing the World Bank’s funding for a number of mining conglomerates operating in the Western Region of Ghana where allegations of environmental and human rights breaches have been levelled against companies.

Moussa Ba of Oxfam said on Thursday: “Today, we have achieved results that are significant,” explaining that NGOs (also referred to as civil society organisations) successfully lobbied the World Bank to relook its funding for abusive multinationals.
Moussa Ba was sharing thoughts at a two-day regional strategic meeting of the West African Civil Society Forum (WACSOF) hosted in Accra from February 21 to 22. The meeting, supported by Oxfam, was called to discuss the topic: “Towards an effective implementation of the ECOWAS Mineral Development Policy (EMDP) and the Development of a Regional Mining Code.”  About 40 persons from nine countries – including Ghana, Nigeria, Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso – are in attendance.
WACSOF documents that through the support of Oxfam it was able to contribute to the EMDP, ensuring that the document “contains people oriented provisions.” ECOWAS adopted the EMDP to promote the sub-region’s extractive industry as well as harmonise the member countries’ mineral policies.
Apart from that, the work of the WACSOF fraternity has partly culminated in major legislative reforms in the global north, including new requirements for companies originating from European and American jurisdictions to report on their payments to host countries.
These reforms are primarily focused at achieving revenue accountability and transparency, according to Felix Delhomme, also of Oxfam. He said, however, that there was a chance for the requirements to be scaled up to include sustainable environmental practice and these could result from comprehensive and targeted advocacy by civil society groups. He therefore cautioned against ad hoc advocacy interventions since these do not lead to lasting outcomes.


1 comment:

  1. I think the talk on transparency and accountability need to move on to financial justice and more. 3% of total production as royalties is woefully inadequate to promote economic growth in a country such as Ghana. what about the social, health and environmental cost which are always externalized and brushed away. What about the pittance paid as compensation to farmers for a perpetual loss of their livelihood which which has rippling effects on their dependents.
    when the royalties are further broken down eventually only miniscule faction of a small fraction of a small fraction of 3% eventually gets to communities where resources were extracted. Communities don't feel the touted positive impact of mining. Our President says he is 'putting people first'. What does that mean in terms of the many farmers who are being driven away from their lands due to overgenerous contracts that governments continue to grant to multinationals?
    CSOs need to swim out of the pools of transparent in to the bigger ocean and really bring change.

    ReplyDelete